Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Keegan Smith vs Luca Staeheli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Staeheli analysis and find out who is favored!
Keegan Smith vs Luca Staeheli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Staeheli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 49.25% of points on their second serve, while Staeheli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 51.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Staeheli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.58% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 64.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Staeheli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 57.35% of matches played (W/L 39/ 29), with Staeheli winning 55.56% (W/L 10/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 126/ 69), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Staeheli has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 31/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Staeheli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smith winning 1 times and Staeheli being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Smith winning 2 and Staeheli winning 1. The last match between Smith and Staeheli was at the Cary 2 Challenger, 10-09-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Keegan Smith getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Staeheli have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smith winning 1 times and Staeheli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 0, and Staeheli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.93 while Staeheli has played against players with an average rank of 66.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Staeheli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 38.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Staeheli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
595
Rank
339
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
61% (147-93)
Career Total W/L
55% (60-50)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,570
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Keegan Smith | Luca Staeheli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 12 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:10 | 2:3:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (49/84) | 62% (43/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (33/49) | 67% (29/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 31% (11/35) | 31% (8/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (32/69) | 48% (40/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 0-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Keegan Smith
Player
Luca Staeheli
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Keegan Smith | Luca Staeheli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (36/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (321/266) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 156 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.92 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1220/1749) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (856/1220) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (255/529) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (70/178) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (694/1742) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Keegan Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Keegan Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
80 of
138)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
8
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
43%
(
25 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
55 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
116)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
7-5 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Andres Urrea
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Keegan Smith
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Keegan Smith
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Keegan Smith
79%
(
85 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Staeheli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Luca Staeheli
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Staeheli
Player
Matthew Thomson
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Luca Staeheli
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Luca Staeheli
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
115)
2
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
3
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
56 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Smith Vs Staeheli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
